Showing posts with label king world news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label king world news. Show all posts

Friday, 13 January 2012

More navel gazing at Gold ETF Investor: saver, trader, investor?

Comments in the last post suggested that I only buy on 'red' days... like today.

But I'm still not ready yet.


Part of this is because I still believe the price could fall further but this isn't really an excuse anymore, I should have a longer term view. So I'm doing nothing while I work out what I should be doing, for how long and with how much money. (Although, if I'm honest, I know I'm also delaying in the hope the gold price will fall and make a decision to buy easier - and I can't quite accept that this may not be a good idea.)

So for now I'm just gathering up what people claim is going on and views on how and when to buy gold.


What's happening today?


Why is the price going down today? Here's Reuters view  with comments from Michael Lewis, analyst at Deutsche Bank saying current price moves don't have much to do with fundamentals and a note from UBS analysts which expects Chinese demand to fall.

But recent figures on Chinese gold imports have turned most gold traders positive according to Bloomberg.


Gold ETFs seem to be have been down all day in various forms


With the US dollar version looking a little worse as the dollar index rose.







What would I get if I bought now and how would it compare to previous buying and selling?



Between 22 September 2011 and 16 December I paid £3,058 for 28 PHAU shares with purchases on three different occasions:

On 12 December 2011 I bought 10 shares for £104.58 each - £1,057.74 in total (after fees).

On 4 November 2012 I bought 10 shares for £108.01 each - £1,092.10 in total (after fees).

On  September 22 I bought 8 shares for £111.98 each -  £907.78 in total (after fees).


If I bought today I would get 10 gold shares for £1,062.52 in total (after fees) which is not much worse than my current best buying rate on 12 December. 



But I think I'm going to hang on for now for academic reasons.




My BlackRock Gold and General fund is back to where it was before the price gyrations although...

I did buy a bit more back on November 24 and 25 which didn't match December lows but wasn't such a bad move as my ETF sale may prove to be 



Food for thought on when and why to buy gold

Bill Bonner, writing in Money Week on 6 January said: "And how about gold? Buy it when people predict it will go lower, not when they expect it to rise. Of course, you don’t know where it will go. But when people think it is going down, odds are… it is cheap."

He also said: "We explained yesterday, we don’t think gold is going to go up this year... even so, we should probably expect it to go up again. Because the danger of thinking it will go up is far lower than the benefit of thinking it will down. We don’t know where gold is going in 2012 but the rest of the monetary system could slip into chaos and calamity at any moment. Gold is the only thing we can depend on."

He gave more on prices in an earlier Forbes article where he thought gold could still fall back to £1,200 but I'm not sure if these are still relevant post the December lows.

"Gold is not too cheap at $1,500. At $1,900 it was too expensive.... In the meantime, we’ll probably see a further correction in the gold price…perhaps down to $1,200. Or, perhaps it will stop at $1,400. We don’t know. And it doesn’t matter. Buy gold on dips; sell stocks on rallies."


When Jeff Lewis interviewed Grant Williams (pointed out in a piece by Bron at Gold Chat), he also mentioned the threat of a $1,200 low but I don't know if it still stands since the pre- New-Year lows.

He said: "I suspect going into 2012, the set up for both precious metals is bullish providing they can hold these levels and I think that is important to know. A lot of very good and well-respected chartists worry that gold could correct to 1,200 to 1,400 bucks. And certainly, if you look at the technical pictures, that could happen. Silver could correct down to the low-20s; it absolutely could happen. But it’s important to decide whether you’re a trader or whether you’re an investor. If you’re investing in silver and you’re investing in gold, based on the fundamental reasons to do so, then falls to the price aren’t that much of a problem for you because they give an opportunity to buy more metal at cheaper prices. If you’re a trader, it’s a whole different world and you have to be very agile and you have to be very attuned to moves like this that could go significantly lower.

But then on 3 January 2012  John Embury at Sprott Asset Management told King World News: "When gold broke through $1,000, I said it would never trade below $1,000 again and it hasn’t. I now think that, unless we have a complete and total financial collapse in the world, I would be surprised if gold ever traded below $1,500 ever again."

Saturday, 5 November 2011

Confusion over futures markets for Monday: good or bad for gold?

The CME - Chicago Mercantile Exchange - runs the US commodities futures markets including gold and silver. It said on friday that it was changing the margin requirements - this means that traders have to put up more of their own cash to participate in the market.

In the past increased margin requirements have been associated with large drops in the price of precious metals and therefore any gold ETFs.

In some quarters CME margin calls are seen as part of a concerted effort to undermine precious metals (see Bart Chilton below!) when investors are looking for safe havens for their cash.

Some of the potential impact of the CME's changes were discussed on Eric De Groot's blog here.

It quotes another story saying the changes imply "that options and futures holders will be forced to deposit addition capital to the CME in the form of maintenance margin, simply to hold their positions. This will put markets under pressure on Monday."

But a further announcement and correction from CME attempted to neutralise this fear: "We apologize for any confusion our initial advisory may have created." Instead it said that it had made it cheaper for people to buy and sell futures to make life easy for MF Global clients transferring their holdings after the firm went bust.

But Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge says the move - making it cheaper for people to buy commodities futures contracts - could make matters worse: "Because while the lower Initial margin may apply to MF accounts, it will also apply to any Tom, Dick and Harry beginning Monday, who will suddenly see a 30% reduced gating threshold to put on a position. Any position, no matter how risky.

"Naturally, if enough people suddenly jump to put on risk, and the market flips and all new positions end up underwater, who will bail out CME accounts if, like MF, there is just not enough capital on the balance sheet? MF Global?"

I hadn't spotted this from last week either: CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton on King World News saying that criminal things have been going on in silver market.